Redmi Note 8 Pro Test Camera

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro sits at the top of Xiaomi's mid-range Redmi lineup, and information technology packs quite a punch for a telephone with a small cost tag.

It'due south powered past Qualcomm's Snapdragon 732G chipset and features a 6.67-inch AMOLED FHD+ display with a 120 Hz refresh rate. In that location are three memory/storage configurations: 6 GB / 64 GB, 6 GB / 128 GB, and viii GB / 128 GB.

The rear camera hump houses a 108 MP principal camera (binning down to 12 MP output), an viii MP ultra-wide, and a 5 MP macro module. There's likewise a two MP depth-sensing photographic camera for bokeh simulation. Read on to discover out how they perform in our DXOMARK Camera tests.

Key photographic camera specifications:

Principal: 108 MP i/1.52″ sensor, 0.7μm pixels, f/1.9 lens
Ultra-broad: 8 MP sensor, f/ii.2 lens, 118° field of view
Macro: 5 MP sensor, f/2.4 AF lens
Depth: two MP sensor, f/2.4 lens
LED flash
2160p/30 fps, 1080p/30, 60 fps

Most DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera'due south default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information nearly the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are bachelor here.

Test summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro

106

camera

seventy

Position in Global Ranking

100^th

vi. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

137

11. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

133

15. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

131

15. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

131

fifteen. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

131

22. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

130

32. Samsung Milky way S22+ (Exynos)

126

32. Samsung Milky way S22 (Exynos)

126

32. Samsung Milky way S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

126

36. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

124

36. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

124

39. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

123

44. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

121

44. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

121

46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Atomic number 26 5G (Snapdragon)

120

46. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

120

46. Samsung Milky way Note20 (Exynos)

120

46. Samsung Milky way Note 20 (Exynos)

120

46. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

120

55. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)

119

55. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

119

58. Apple tree iPhone SE (2022)

118

58. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

118

58. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)

118

64. Samsung Milky way Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

117

68. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)

116

68. Samsung Milky way S21 5G (Exynos)

116

68. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)

116

72. Samsung Milky way S20 FE (Exynos)

115

eighty. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Snapdragon)

112

91. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G

109

91. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold two

109

93. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+

108

100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

106

103. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

105

103. Samsung Milky way A53 5G

105

103. Samsung Milky way A52s 5G

105

103. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

105

113. Apple tree iPhone SE (2020)

103

116. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

102

116. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

102

122. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 11S 5G

124. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

124. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

127. Xiaomi Redmi Notation 10S

130. Samsung Milky way A22 5G

131. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G

131. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 11

131. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

135. Samsung Milky way A51 5G

Position in Advanced Ranking

6^th

6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

106

9. Apple iPhone SE (2020)

103

12. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation eleven Pro 5G

102

xv. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

17. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

20. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

Pros

Lots of fine detail in close-upwardly outdoor portraits
Accurate exposure preview in stills
Depth estimation and blur gradient more often than not authentic in portrait mode
Accurate ultra-broad exposure with pleasant color outdoors
Accurate video exposure
Well-controlled dissonance in videos
Nice white residue and peel tones in indoor videos

Cons

Clipping in loftier dynamic range scenes (stills)
Frequent greenish color cast in outdoor stills
Ghosting in stills with motility
Low particular and unnatural rendering in tele-zoom shots
Video AF failures and instabilities, especially indoors and in low lite
Limited video dynamic range

With an overall score of 106, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro does not country well-nigh the superlative of the DXOMARK Camera overall ranking, but is a respectable number three in the Advanced ($200-399) price segment, comparing favorably to slightly more than expensive options like the Apple iPhone SE (103) and the Oppo Detect X2 Neo (105).

The Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro captures pleasing images under ideal atmospheric condition, only functioning is less impressive under challenging lighting.

The Redmi Notation x Pro'due south main camera can capture pleasing images as long as the lighting isn't likewise challenging (that is, non too dark, not too much dynamic range); and while its Photograph score of 111 lags behind most higher-cease offerings, it is splendid for the Advanced category.

The Zoom composite score of 52 is not particularly impressive, held back mainly by express tele performance, merely we've seen worse. The video score of 95 is respectable at this price point, and fifty-fifty edges by the far more expensive Exynos versions of Samsung's Galaxy S21 and S21+ models (93).

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro can't compete with nearly flagship phones in terms of imaging quality, but it's still a high-value proffer for mobile photographers on a upkeep.

Below yous tin can find a detailed analysis and image samples for all Photo, Zoom, and Video sub-attributes, besides as comparisons with 2 of the Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro'due south competitors, the Nokia 8.iii 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G.

Photo

The Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro achieves a Photo score of 111. In this department, nosotros take a closer look at each sub-attribute and compare image quality against competitors.

Exposure and Contrast

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro

111

Accolade Magic4 Ultimate

Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (111)

In these tests we analyze target exposure, dissimilarity, and dynamic range, including repeatability across a series of images. Tests are undertaken in a wide range of low-cal weather condition, including backlit scenes and low light down to 1 lux. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's exposure performance in backlit weather condition compared to the contest.

Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 10 Pro, highlight clipping

Nokia 8.3 5G, highlight and shadow clipping

Samsung A51 5G, highlight clipping

Colour

Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro

107

Apple iPhone thirteen Pro Max

Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (107)

In these tests we analyze color rendering, skin tones, white residuum, and colour shading, including repeatability across a series of images. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of existent-life images.

These samples evidence the Xiaomi Redmi Annotation ten Pro'south color functioning in outdoor light compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Notation 10 Pro, dark-green cast

Nokia 8.3 5G, more neutral color

Samsung Milky way A51 5G, pinkish cast

Autofocus

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

109

Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

Best: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109)

In these tests we analyze autofocus accuracy and shooting fourth dimension, including repeatability, in the lab. We test focus failures, depth of field, and tracking of moving subjects using perceptual assay of existent-life images.

These samples evidence the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's autofocus functioning outdoors with 2 subjects at different distances.

Xiaomi Redmi Notation ten Pro, autofocus

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: focus non on nearest subject

Nokia viii.iii 5G, ingather: focus on first subject

Samsung A51 5G, autofocus

Samsung A51 5G, crop: focus on first bailiwick

Texture

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

111

Xiaomi Mi 11

Best: Xiaomi Mi eleven (111)

In these tests we analyze texture on faces and objects, including objects in move, in a range of calorie-free conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual assay of real-life images.

These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 10 Pro's texture performance in outdoor lite compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Notation 10 Pro, texture

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro, crop: good detail

Nokia 8.iii 5G, crop: acceptable particular

Samsung A51 5G, crop: acceptable item

This graph shows the Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro's texture measurements in the lab.

Texture comparison: texture drops off in low light.

Noise

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro

102

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (102)

In these tests nosotros analyze noise on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of lite atmospheric condition, using several lab test setups and perceptual assay of real-life images.

These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro's racket operation in low calorie-free compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, noise

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro, crop: good item

Nokia 8.3 5G, ingather: acceptable item

Samsung A51 5G, crop: acceptable detail

Bokeh

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro

All-time: Huawei P50 Pro (80)

For these tests we switch to the camera's bokeh or portrait mode and clarify depth estimation, bokeh shape, blur slope, and repeatability, as well every bit all other general image quality attributes mentioned above. The score is derived from perceptual assay of real-life images.

These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro's bokeh simulation in daylight compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro, practiced subject separation, natural blur

Nokia eight.three 5G, obvious depth-sensing errors, natural blur

Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, depth-sensing artifacts, depression overall particular

Nighttime

Xiaomi Redmi Annotation ten Pro

Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

Best: Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ (82)

In these tests nosotros shoot a selection of images in pitch-black darkness as well as with city lights in the background providing some illumination. We shoot sample images with the camera at default settings in both wink-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all image quality attributes just we pay particular attention to exposure, autofocus, and colour. We do not test night modes that have to be activated manually.

These samples evidence the Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro's dark performance in flash-automobile mode compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, wink-car: good exposure, racket adequately well controlled

Nokia eight.three 5G, flash-car: good exposure, more noise

Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, flash-machine: good target exposure, nighttime background (flash fired)

Artifacts

Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro

Google Pixel 6

Best: Google Pixel vi (77)

In these tests we bank check images for optical artifacts such as vignetting, flare, lens softness in the corner, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, as well as for processing artifacts such as ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing.

This sample shows ghosting artifacts.

Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 10 Pro, artifacts

Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 10 Pro, crop: ghosting artifacts

Preview

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (80)

In these tests nosotros analyze the image quality of the preview epitome and the differences between preview images and captured images, particularly in terms of exposure, dynamic range, and bokeh upshot. We also check the smoothness of the field-of-view changes on the preview image when zooming with both buttons or when using the pinch-zoom gesture.

These samples bear witness the Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro's preview operation in portrait fashion.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, preview in Portrait mode: no blur shown

Xiaomi Redmi Note x Pro, final image: portrait mistiness applied

Zoom

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro achieves a Zoom score of 45. The Zoom score includes the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against competitors.

Broad

Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro

Accolade Magic4 Ultimate

All-time: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (58)

In these tests we analyze the operation of the ultra-broad camera at several focal lengths from 12 to 20 mm. We await at all epitome quality attributes, just we pay detail attention to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion.

These samples show the performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro'south ultra-broad camera in indoor conditions compared to the competition.

Xiaomi Redmi Notation x Pro, ultra-wide: slight lack of contrast and desaturated colors

Nokia viii.iii 5G, ultra-wide: meliorate color

Samsung Milky way A51 5G, ultra-broad: widest coverage

Tele

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

140

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All-time: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (140)

In these tests nosotros analyze all image quality attributes at focal lengths from approximately 40 to 300 mm, paying item attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

These samples evidence the Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro's and its competitors' tele performance outdoors at a 110 mm equivalent zoom setting.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, 110 mm zoom

Xiaomi Redmi Notation 10 Pro, ingather: lack of detail

Nokia eight.three 5G, 110 mm zoom

Nokia 8.iii 5G, crop: depression detail

Samsung A51 5G, 110 mm zoom

Samsung A51 5G, crop: low (though slightly amend) detail

Video

The Xiaomi Redmi Note ten Pro achieves a Video score of 95. A device's overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same mode equally the Photo score. In this department, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare video quality confronting competitors.

In our Video tests we clarify the same paradigm quality attributes every bit for nevertheless images, such as white residual and color rendering, only we also include such temporal aspects as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, and autofocus.

NOTE: The sample video clips in this department are best viewed at 4K resolution.